Prototype MacHine Company v. Toledo P. Boulware, Individually and as Trustee Jewel F. Robinson 4-S Ranch Shaver Bandera Ranch, LLC as Successor-In-Interest to Dos Angeles, LP. Zach & Kayla Davis D.M.C. Partners, Ltd. Willie Jo Dooley, L.P. Hayden G. Haby & Doris Y. Haby Hayden G. Haby, Jr., & Denette Haby Coates Melanie & John Jones in Their Capacity as Joint Representatives of the Ben Jones Sr. Estate and Ben Jones Jr. Estate McDaniel Farms, Inc. Justin Burk D/B/A Burk Farms Robert E. Condry John Boerschig
Prototype MacHine Company v. Toledo P. Boulware, Individually and as Trustee Jewel F. Robinson 4-S Ranch Shaver Bandera Ranch, LLC as Successor-In-Interest to Dos Angeles, LP. Zach & Kayla Davis D.M.C. Partners, Ltd. Willie Jo Dooley, L.P. Hayden G. Haby & Doris Y. Haby Hayden G. Haby, Jr., & Denette Haby Coates Melanie & John Jones in Their Capacity as Joint Representatives of the Ben Jones Sr. Estate and Ben Jones Jr. Estate McDaniel Farms, Inc. Justin Burk D/B/A Burk Farms Robert E. Condry John Boerschig
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-19-00491-CV
PROTOTYPE MACHINE COMPANY v. TOLEDO P. BOULWARE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE; JEWEL F. ROBINSON; 4-S RANCH; SHAVER BANDERA RANCH, LLC AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO DOS ANGELES, LP.; ZACH & KAYLA DAVIS; D.M.C. PARTNERS, LTD.; WILLIE JO DOOLEY, L.P.; HAYDEN G. HABY & DORIS Y. HABY; HAYDEN G. HABY, JR., & DENETTE HABY COATES; MELANIE & JOHN JONES IN THEIR CAPACITY AS JOINT REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BEN JONES SR. ESTATE AND BEN JONES JR. ESTATE; MCDANIEL FARMS, INC.; JUSTIN BURK D/B/A BURK FARMS; ROBERT E. CONDRY; JOHN BOERSCHIG, TULLY SHAHAN; KINNEY COUNTY GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, AND GENELL HOBBS IN HER OFFICAL CAPACITY AS GENERAL MANAGER OF THE KINNEY COUNTY GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
On Appeal from the 63rd District Court of Kinney County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 3469-A
JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
July 29, 2021
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.