Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas), 2021

Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder

Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Decided July 29, 2021
Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 29, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00164-CV

CHARLES “CHUCK” ZUBARIK, Appellant

V. FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, MARIANNE GONZALEZ, THE FIRST AMENDED PHILLIPS FAMILY TRUST, RONI HENDERSON, ERIC SORENSEN, JAMIE SORENSEN, DAVID SMELSER, AND LINDSAY SMELSER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-18220

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s March 15, 2021 order vacating its severance order signed on December 4, 2020. We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal because the order vacating a severance order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a). At our request, the parties filed letter briefs addressing the jurisdictional issue.

In his letter brief, appellant, rather than addressing the question posed – whether the order vacating the severance order is final or otherwise appealable – addresses the merits as to why the trial court erred in signing that order. Nothing in appellant’s letter brief demonstrates that we have jurisdiction to review an order vacating a severance order.

The order vacating the severance order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order. For this reason, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

210164F.P05

S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

CHARLES “CHUCK” ZUBARIK, On Appeal from the 68th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-18220. No. 05-21-00164-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice

Burns. Justices Molberg and FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, Goldstein participating.

MARIANNE GONZALEZ, THE FIRST AMENDED PHILLIPS FAMILY TRUST, RONI HENDERSON, ERIC SORENSEN, JAMIE SORENSEN, DAVID SMELSER, AND LINDSAY SMELSER, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, MARIANNE GONZALEZ, THE FIRST AMENDED PHILLIPS FAMILY TRUST, RONI HENDERSON, ERIC SORENSEN, JAMIE SORENSEN, DAVID SMELSER, AND LINDSAY SMELSER recover their costs of this appeal from appellant CHARLES “CHUCK” ZUBARIK.

Judgment entered July 29, 2021.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.