Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021

Deloris Phillips v. Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers Compensation

Deloris Phillips v. Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers Compensation
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided August 31, 2021
Deloris Phillips v. Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers Compensation

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 31, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00498-CV

DELORIS PHILLIPS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.,

BANKERS STANDARD, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 767, AND ESIS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06299

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Osborne

In her notice of appeal, appellant states that she is appealing from an order orally rendered denying her appointment of counsel. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal because, even assuming the trial court has signed an order, such an order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (generally appellate courts have jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and interlocutory orders permitted by statute); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a) (listing appealable interlocutory orders).

As requested appellant filed a letter brief. She also filed an amended notice of appeal to additionally challenge the trial court’s denial of her motion for discovery. Neither an order denying a motion to appoint counsel nor a motion for discovery is an appealable interlocutory order that confers jurisdiction on the Court, and nothing in appellant’s letter brief demonstrates our jurisdiction. See Wilcox v. Wilcox, No. 05-09-01421-CV, 2010 WL 457434, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 11, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (order on motion to appoint counsel not appealable); See Sharma v. Vinmar Int’l, Ltd., 231 S.W.3d 405, 422 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (order denying discovery not appealable). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

210498f.p05 /Leslie Osborne// LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DELORIS PHILLIPS, Appellant On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-21-00498-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06299. Opinion delivered by Justice TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and INSURANCE DIVISION OF Nowell participating.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION,

FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.,

BANKERS STANDARD, UNITED

PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

CO., TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION

767, AND ESIS, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 31st day of August, 2021.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.