Birtan Yentur v. Munevver D. Korkmaz
Birtan Yentur v. Munevver D. Korkmaz
Opinion
Opinion issued September 16, 2021
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00153-CV ——————————— BIRTAN YENTUR, Appellant V. MUNEVVER D. KORKMAZ, Appellee
On Appeal from the 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 20-DCV-278942
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Birtan Yentur, has neither established indigence for purposes of court costs nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond to this Court’s notice and a clerk’s record has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.