Retail Services WIS Corporation D/B/A Product Connections, John Jason Gramling, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, Katherine Palmer, Casey King, and James Rose v. Crossmark, Inc.

Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-01054-CV

RETAIL SERVICES WIS CORPORATION D/B/A PRODUCT

CONNECTIONS, JOHN JASON GRAMLING, NATHAN STOUT,

AMANDA VILLA, KATHERINE PALMER, CASEY KING, AND

JAMES ROSE, Appellants

V.

CROSSMARK, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-05122-2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Molberg Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed voluntary motion to dismiss, which asks that we dismiss the appeal, with costs to be borne by each party as incurred by them, pursuant to a settlement agreement reached between the parties. The motion also asks that we lift the stay imposed by our March 10, 2021 order so the parties can dismiss the underlying litigation. We grant appellants’ motion, lift the temporary stay imposed by our May 10, 2021 order, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Subject to any agreement between the parties, each party will bear its own costs of appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, our mandate will issue forthwith.

201054f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

RETAIL SERVICES WIS On Appeal from the 429th Judicial CORPORATION D/B/A PRODUCT District Court, Collin County, Texas CONNECTIONS, JOHN JASON Trial Court Cause No. 429-05122- GRAMLING, NATHAN STOUT, 2020.

AMANDA VILLA, KATHERINE Opinion delivered by Justice PALMER, CASEY KING, AND Molberg. Justices Goldstein and JAMES ROSE, Appellants Smith participating.

No. 05-20-01054-CV V.

CROSSMARK, INC., Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that each party to bear its own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered this 21st day of September, 2021.