Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021

Robin Rouse and Sabrina Rouse v. Thomas Campbell, Foster Management, LLC, Foster Timber, LTD, and Christy W. Kolva

Robin Rouse and Sabrina Rouse v. Thomas Campbell, Foster Management, LLC, Foster Timber, LTD, and Christy W. Kolva
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided September 28, 2021
Robin Rouse and Sabrina Rouse v. Thomas Campbell, Foster Management, LLC, Foster Timber, LTD, and Christy W. Kolva

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ NO. 09-21-00023-CV __________________

ROBIN ROUSE AND SABRINA ROUSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TERRILL

SCATENA, Appellants/Cross-Appellees

V.

THOMAS CAMPBELL, CHRISTY W. KOLVA, ISABELLE CAMPBELL, AND ASHLEY GATES, FOSTER MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND FOSTER TIMBER, LTD, Appellees/Cross-Appellants; J.P. MORGAN CHASE, N.A.,

AND NEIL CAMPBELL, Appellees/Cross-Appellees __________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-12-15871-CV

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Robin Rouse and Sabrina Rouse, appellants, filed a motion for review of the trial court’s September 20, 2021, supersedeas order, which set the amount of security required to stay execution on the judgment at $3,186,522.53 and limited the duration of a supersedeas bond to thirty days or less. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(a). Appellants request a temporary stay freezing any sales of the property at issue in this litigation, or any enforcement of the final judgment until further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(c).

The Court finds that temporary relief is necessary to preserve the parties’ rights. This Court temporarily stays the sale of the property at issue and any further enforcement of the final judgment, until this Court rules on the motion for review of the trial court’s supersedeas order. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(c).

Appellants’ motion for review remains pending before the Court. Appellees’ response to the motion for review is due October 8, 2021.

ORDER ENTERED September 28, 2021.

PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.