Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2021

Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.

Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 30, 2021

Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-21-00154-CV MARIA SOCORRO ESTRADA, § On Appeal from the 141st District INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF Court THE ESTATE OF CESAR ESTRADA RANGEL, AND AS NEXT OF FRIEND TO C.E., JR., Y.E. AND N.E., MINORS; JULIANA MEZA ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF LEO MARIN AND AS NEXT § of Tarrant County (141-314482-20) FRIEND TO E.I.M., A MINOR; AMANDA M. ESTRADA AS NEXT FRIEND TO J.O.H.P., A MINOR; AND DAMIAN MICHAEL ESTRADA, Appellants § September 30, 2021 V. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A TEMPTATIONS CABARET, INC.; RCI HOSPITALITY HOLDINGS, INC.; AND § Memorandum Opinion by Justice RCI HOLDINGS, INC., Appellees Bassel JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellants shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.