in Re Douglas C. Glenewinkel and Ward A. Glenewinkel
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00299-CV
IN RE Douglas C. GLENEWINKEL and Ward A. Glenewinkel, Relator(s) Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 29, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On July 26, 2021, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief, which this court granted on July 29, 2021. The real parties in interest filed a response to which relators replied. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators did not show they are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.