Alice Adrianne Jarman v. Belinda Dianne Jarman Brown Cosby and Cheryl Lynn Jarman Foster
Alice Adrianne Jarman v. Belinda Dianne Jarman Brown Cosby and Cheryl Lynn Jarman Foster
Opinion
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 28, 2021.
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00336-CV ALICE ADRIANNE JARMAN, Appellant V. BELINDA DIANNE JARMAN BROWN COSBY AND CHERYL LYNN JARMAN FOSTER, Appellees On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 441992-401 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Alice Adrianne Jarman petitions this court to allow a permissive interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s June 3, 2021 amended order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment.
To be to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would not otherwise entitled be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order to be appealed involves a “controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion” and (2) an immediate appeal from the order “may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a), (e)(4); Tex. R. Civ. P. 168. After reviewing the petition, the record, appellees’ response, and appellant’s reply, we conclude that the petition does not meet the requirements for a permissive interlocutory appeal.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for permissive interlocutory appeal.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.