NO. 12-21-00167-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ANDREW WARNER, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW ERICA NAJERA, APPELLEE § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Andrew Warner appeals from a judgment signed on August 31, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., September 30, 2021. On October 5, this Court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement within ten days if he had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested.

On October 22, the Clerk of this Court issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was filed on or before November 1, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (after giving ten days’ notice, appellate court may dismiss appeal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered November 3, 2021.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT NOVEMBER 3, 2021

NO. 12-21-00167-CV

ANDREW WARNER, Appellant V. ERICA NAJERA, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CCL-21-17376) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.