Holland D. Jones v. Angela Thomas, Individually, Mike Tisdale, Individually and Aspect Building & Development Group, LLC
Holland D. Jones v. Angela Thomas, Individually, Mike Tisdale, Individually and Aspect Building & Development Group, LLC
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00116-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ HOLLAND D. JONES, Appellant, v. ANGELA THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY, MIKE TISDALE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASPECT BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 458th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva This matter is before the Court on its own motion. 1 On October 15, 2021, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant provided reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file a brief. Appellant failed to respond to the notice and has not filed a brief.
Appellant has neither reasonably explained his failure to file a motion for extension of time nor filed his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).
CLARISSA SILVA Justice Delivered and filed on the 18th day of November, 2021.
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the First Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.