TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00658-CR

Raymond E. Solis, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 16,366, THE HONORABLE REVA TOWSLEE-CORBETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Raymond Solis, acting pro se, filed his notice of appeal of the district court’s order denying his pretrial motion to quash indictment. However, we lack jurisdiction over Solis’s appeal.

In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when specifically authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos v. Fine, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); see Bayless v. State, 91 S.W.3d 801, 805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (“[A] defendant’s right of appeal is a statutorily created right.”). The standard for determining whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a case “is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law.” Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2012) (quoting Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)); Fine, 330 S.W.3d at 915. Thus, we “do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.” Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ex parte Shumake, 953 S.W.2d 842, 844 (Tex. App.—Austin 1997, no pet.).

No such grant exists for a defendant’s direct appeal of an interlocutory order denying a pretrial motion to quash. See, e.g., Ex parte Wiley, 949 S.W.2d 3, 4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ) (dismissing appeal because “[t]here is no statute providing for interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to dismiss”).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2 (f).

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: December 30, 2021 Do Not Publish