Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2022

John Charles Denelsbeck, III v. the State of Texas

John Charles Denelsbeck, III v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 10, 2022

John Charles Denelsbeck, III v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-21-00067-CR

JOHN CHARLES DENELSBECK, III, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Delta County, Texas Trial Court No. 7735

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

ORDER Our review of the clerk’s record and the court reporter’s record in this matter indicates that such records contain unredacted “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s and reporter’s record include the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(f) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(f). Therefore, because the clerk’s and reporter’s record contain unredacted sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court, or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(f), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and reporter’s record in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(f).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT Date: January 10, 2022

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.