Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2022

Marcus Neal Meadows v. the State of Texas

Marcus Neal Meadows v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 10, 2022

Marcus Neal Meadows v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00229-CR __________________ MARCUS NEAL MEADOWS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-08-10586-CR __________________________________________________________________ ORDER Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of appellant’s right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

On January 5, 2022, appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before January 31, 2022. See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 321–22.

ORDER ENTERED January 10, 2022.

PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.