Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2022

Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC

Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 26, 2022

Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00384-CV

Kirsten Hanna; Upside Up Properties, LLC; and Upside Up Ventures, Inc., Appellants v. M. Matthew Williams; David Howell; Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams; and Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC, Appellees

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-21-000957, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 3, 2021, we granted appellants’ unopposed motion to abate their appeal so that they could cure a “potential jurisdictional impediment” by having the trial court sever appellees’ counterclaim from the underlying proceeding. See Hanna v. Williams, No. 03-21-00384-CV, 2021 WL 5750189, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 3, 2021, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Appellants have now filed both a status report stating that the trial court denied their motion to sever and an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant appellants’ motion, and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: January 26, 2022

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.