Desiree Felicia Sapp

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 10, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00009-CV DESIREE FELICIA SAPP, Appellant1 On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-76497 MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed December 2, 2021. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The order appellant is attempting to appeal is the denial of appellant’s application for a temporary restraining order. The denial of an application for a temporary restraining order is an unappealable interlocutory order. See Nikolouzos v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Hosp., 162 S.W.3d 678, 681 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.). We have no jurisdiction except to dismiss this appeal.

On February 15, 2022, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before February 28, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.