Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. MacKenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP.
Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. MacKenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Hartman Income Reit, Inc. v. Mackenzie Blue Ridge Fund III, LP.
Appellate case number: 01-20-00218-CV Trial court case number: 2019-21776 Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County Counsel for appellant filed a motion to substitute counsel on March 11, 2021, but the motion does not comply with the requirements of Rule 6.5 in that it fails to state or indicate that the motion was delivered to the appellant, either in person or by certified and first-class mail to the party (appellant). See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(d), (b).
Accordingly, the motion to substitute counsel is denied without prejudice to refiling an amended motion in compliance with Rule 6.5.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: __/s/ Peter Kelly_____ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __March 17, 2022_____
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.