DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 18, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-01074-CV MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT HOFER, AND SOFIJA HOFER, Appellants V. CITY OF EULESS, SELF-INSURED, Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-01243-2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Seeking to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their plea to the jurisdiction, appellants have filed a petition for permissive appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3.

After considering the petition, response, and reply, we deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(f); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Feagan v. Wilson, No. 11-21-00032-CV, 2021 WL 1134804, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Eastland Mar. 25, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

211074F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT On Appeal from the 366th Judicial HOFER, AND SOFIJA HOFER, District Court, Collin County, Texas Appellants Trial Court Cause No. 366-01243- 2017.

No. 05-21-01074-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and CITY OF EULESS, SELF- Goldstein participating.

INSURED, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee City of Euless, Self-Insured recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Marta Danylyk, Helmut Hofer, and Sofija Hofer.

Judgment entered March 18, 2022

–3–