Andreger Tolbert v. Bryant Tolbert
Andreger Tolbert v. Bryant Tolbert
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00026-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ ANDREGER TOLBERT, Appellant, v. BRYANT TOLBERT, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 264th District Court of Bell County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina This matter is before the court on its own motion.1 On February 2, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal failed to comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e) and was provided thirty days to correct the defect. On March 10, 2022, the Clerk
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 of the Court again notified appellant that his notice of appeal failed to comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e) and was provided ten days to correct the defect. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).
Appellant failed to cure the defect in his notice of appeal and has not otherwise responded to the clerk’s notices. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
JAIME TIJERINA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 26th day of May, 2022
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.