Deny and Opinion Filed June 27, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00178-CV IN RE JA-LYNN KUO; JLKUO, PLLC; SUBHO MULLICK; SM ER, PLC; SALIMA AMIN THOBANI; AND SRG CONSULTING, LLC, Relators Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02273 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne Before the Court are relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest’s response. In the petition, relators challenge the trial court’s order granting real party’s motion to strike relators’ jury demand and the trial court’s order denying relators’ motion for continuance.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)). Based on our review of the petition, response, and the record, we conclude that relators have failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

220178f.p05 /Leslie L. Osborne/ LESLIE L. OSBORNE JUSTICE

–2–