in the Matter of W.A.M.P.
in the Matter of W.A.M.P.
Opinion
Remanded and Memorandum Opinion and Memorandum Concurring Opinion filed July 28, 2022.
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00105-CV IN THE MATTER OF W.A.M.P. On Appeal from the 315th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020-00197J MEMORANDUM CONCURRING OPINION I reluctantly dispose of issue 4 on factual sufficiency in the court’s opinion because I recognize that current Texas jurisprudence continues to wish Texas Constitution article V, section 6—the factual conclusivity clause—away in criminal and quasi-criminal cases. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6.
While I believe that Brooks v. State is constitutionally unsound, Brooks remains the controlling case law and this court has followed along in juvenile-justice cases as well. Brooks, 323 S.W.3d 893 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
Hoping that things will not always be this way, I reluctantly concur in the judgment regarding factual sufficiency.
/s/ Charles A. Spain Justice
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.