in Re Darius Duron Elam
in Re Darius Duron Elam
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2022.
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00527-CR
IN RE DARIUS DURON ELAM, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380350-I MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 18, 2022, relator Darius Duron Elam filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator claims the trial court wrongfully declined to allow the Harris County District Attorney’s office to represent the State in his post- conviction habeas corpus proceeding before the trial court, and he seeks mandamus relief against the trial court’s order.
Although this court and other Texas courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings lies solely with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 5; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Therefore, we have no jurisdiction with regard to relator’s petition. Consequently, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.