Janet McCathern v. Ivy Apartments
Janet McCathern v. Ivy Apartments
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 20, 2022 No. 04-22-00584-CV Raynelle MCCATHERN, Appellant v. IVY APARTMENTS, Appellee From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV01871 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding ORDER Appellant attempts to appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding possession of real property to appellee Ivy Apartments. The trial court signed the judgment on July 13, 2022. The notice of appeal was due August 12, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on August 29, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed her notice of appeal on September 8, 2022. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file her notice of appeal.
A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, “once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id. We therefore ORDER appellant to file, on or before October 20, 2022, a response showing cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
All deadlines in this appeal are suspended until further order of the court.
Entered on this 20th day of September, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Attested to: ______________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.