Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2022

Bellingham Enterprises, LLC v. Colby Constructors, LLC Travis County Commissioners Court Andy Brown in His Official Capacity as County Judge Margaret Gómez in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner Ann Howard in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner Brigid Shea in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner And Jeff Travillion in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner

Bellingham Enterprises, LLC v. Colby Constructors, LLC Travis County Commissioners Court Andy Brown in His Official Capacity as County Judge Margaret Gómez in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner Ann Howard in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner Brigid Shea in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner And Jeff Travillion in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 13, 2022

Bellingham Enterprises, LLC v. Colby Constructors, LLC Travis County Commissioners Court Andy Brown in His Official Capacity as County Judge Margaret Gómez in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner Ann Howard in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner Brigid Shea in Her Official Capacity as County Commissioner And Jeff Travillion in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2022

NO. 03-22-00233-CV

Bellingham Enterprises, LLC, Appellant v. Colby Constructors, LLC; Travis County Commissioners Court; Andy Brown in his Official Capacity as County Judge; Margaret Gómez in her Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Ann Howard in her Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Brigid Shea in her Official Capacity as County Commissioner; and Jeff Travillion in his Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the final orders signed by the trial court on April 1, 2022. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the orders. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s final orders. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.