Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2022

in Re Public Utility Commission of Texas Peter Lake, Chariman Will McAdams, Commissioner Lori Cobos, Commissioner And Jimmy Glotfelty, Commissioner, Each in His or Her Official Capacity at the Public Utility Commission of Texas

in Re Public Utility Commission of Texas Peter Lake, Chariman Will McAdams, Commissioner Lori Cobos, Commissioner And Jimmy Glotfelty, Commissioner, Each in His or Her Official Capacity at the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 27, 2022

in Re Public Utility Commission of Texas Peter Lake, Chariman Will McAdams, Commissioner Lori Cobos, Commissioner And Jimmy Glotfelty, Commissioner, Each in His or Her Official Capacity at the Public Utility Commission of Texas

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00419-CV

In re Public Utility Commission of Texas; Peter Lake, Chariman; Will McAdams, Commissioner; Lori Cobos, Commissioner; and Jimmy Glotfelty, Commissioner, Each in His or Her Official Capacity at the Public Utility Commission of Texas

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s communication to the parties that it intends to hold a hearing on the motion of real party in interest, AMA Communications, LLC d/b/a AMA TechTel Communications, to enforce the trial court’s temporary injunction. Relators contend that if the trial court proceeds with a hearing, it will violate the automatic stay of trial-court proceedings while an appeal in the underlying proceeding is pending. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(b) (providing that certain interlocutory appeals stay all proceedings in trial court “pending resolution of the appeal”). This Court has issued an opinion and mandate in the underlying matter, 03-21-00597- CV, and therefore the automatic stay in the underlying proceeding has been lifted. See id. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings . . . .”); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a) (“Action on [Original] Petition”). Relators’ motion for emergency relief is also denied.

__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana Filed: October 27, 2022

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.