Opinion filed November 17, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-22-00108-CV ___________ ROBERT PERRY HUNSAKER AND JEANIE NELL HUNSAKER, Appellants V. SHERRY RICHARDSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 29th District Court Palo Pinto County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C48479

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Robert Perry Hunsaker and Jeanie Nell Hunsaker, have filed in this court an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In the motion, Appellants state that the controversy between the parties has ended because the dog—the possession of which was at the center of the parties’ dispute—has died. Because the dog’s death moots this appeal, Appellants ask that we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss this appeal. According to Appellants, Appellee does not oppose Appellants’ motion.

Accordingly, we grant Appellants’ unopposed motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment insofar as it awarded possession of the dog at issue, and dismiss this appeal.

PER CURIAM

November 17, 2022 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.