Kenneth B. Chaiken and Patricia Harvey v. Corvalla, LTD.
Kenneth B. Chaiken and Patricia Harvey v. Corvalla, LTD.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00369-CV ___________________________ KENNETH B. CHAIKEN AND PATRICIA HARVEY, Appellants V. CORVALLA, LTD., Appellee
On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-5037-431
Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT We have considered appellants’ “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Accordingly, Appellee’s “Opposed Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief” is denied as moot.
Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.
Per Curiam Delivered: December 1, 2022
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.