the Hertz Corporation v. Chandra Oglen
the Hertz Corporation v. Chandra Oglen
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00280-CV
The Hertz Corporation, Appellant v. Chandra Oglen, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 90538, THE HONORABLE JEANNE PARKER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant’s brief was originally due on July 25, 2022. After this Court granted multiple motions requesting an extension of time to file appellant’s brief, the brief was due on November 30, 2022, per the Court’s October 31, 2022 order. To date, the brief has not been tendered for filing and is overdue. On December 2, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a third motion for extension of time, requesting an extension until January 30, 2023. In the Court’s October 31, 2022 order granting the most recent extension, this Court advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted. Accordingly, we deny the third motion for extension of time and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: December 13, 2022
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.