Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2022

Jason Omar Moreno v. the State of Texas

Jason Omar Moreno v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 21, 2022

Jason Omar Moreno v. the State of Texas

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-000409-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

JASON OMAR MORENO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel in

1See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). this cause. Appellant has been unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se response to the Anders brief. Appellant has filed a motion for access to the appellate record.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant’s motion should be granted with order. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion, and it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty (20) days thereafter to file its response, if any.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 21st day of December, 2022.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.