in Re Ross Hendricks
in Re Ross Hendricks
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 28, 2022 No. 04-22-00819-CR IN RE Ross HENDRICKS Original Proceeding 1 ORDER On December 7, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review.
See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on December 28, 2022.
_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of December, 2022.
_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CR11156, styled State of Texas v. Ross Hendricks, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.