Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2023

Spotsylvania Mall Company v. Mida Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Parmida Home

Spotsylvania Mall Company v. Mida Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Parmida Home
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 12, 2023

Spotsylvania Mall Company v. Mida Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Parmida Home

Opinion

DISMISSED w/ PREJUDICE and Opinion Filed January 12, 2023

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00342-CV SPOTSYLVANIA MALL COMPANY, Appellant V. MIDA HOLDINGS, INC. D/B/A PARMIDA HOME, BARDI FAIZY, AND MONDANA TAGHIZADEH, Appellees On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-15264 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, appellant informs us that the foreign judgment made the subject of this enforcement suit was declared void and vacated by the issuing court. Accordingly, appellant requests this appeal be dismissed with prejudice. We grant appellant’s motion, and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE 220342F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT SPOTSYLVANIA MALL On Appeal from the 298th Judicial COMPANY, Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-15264.

No. 05-22-00342-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Chief Justice Burns and MIDA HOLDINGS, INC. D/B/A Justice Molberg participating.

PARMIDA HOME, BARDI FAIZY, AND MONDANA TAGHIZADEH Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered January 12, 2023

–2–

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.