F. Douglas Montague III and Montague Pittman & Varnado, P.A. v. Michael Pohl
F. Douglas Montague III and Montague Pittman & Varnado, P.A. v. Michael Pohl
Opinion
Opinion issued February 9, 2023
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00649-CV ——————————— F. DOUGLAS MONTAGUE III AND MONTAGUE PITTMAN & VARNADO, P.A., Appellants V. MICHAEL POHL AND LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL A. POHL PLLC; BAKER NICHOLSON LAW FIRM; TINA NICHOLSON; LANCE KASSAB; LANCE CHRISTOPHER KASSAB, P.C. D/B/A THE KASSAB LAW FIRM; SCOTT FAVRE; SCOTT M. FAVRE PUBLIC ADJUSTER, LLC; AND PRECISION MARKETING GROUP, LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2018-58419
MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).1 We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.
Although the motion also requests that we lift the automatic stay imposed under Section 51.014(b) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, we need not order the stay lifted because it necessarily terminates upon dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(b) (providing certain interlocutory appeals stay all proceedings in trial court “pending resolution of the appeal”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.