Opinion issued February 7, 2023

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00049-CR ——————————— IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, DeAndre DeBoest, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to “[a]cknowledge [his] [r]equest [t]o [h]ave [w]ritten [r]uling[s] [m]ade on ALL [m]otions [he] [f]iled still pending before the [trial court].” According to his petition, this includes the following motions and pleadings: “Waiver of Counsel to Proceed Pro Se, Motion Requesting an Examining Trial, Habeas Corpus for Excessive Bail, and [t]he Speedy Trial Motion . . . Motion to Suppress (Warrantless Seizure).”1 Our review of DeBoest’s mandamus petition reflects that DeBoest has failed to establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7, 52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny DeBoest’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Hightower, and Guerra.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

The underlying case is DeAndre DeBoest v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 1792110, in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill presiding.