in Re: Yolanda Hayes and Keldrick Hayes
in Re: Yolanda Hayes and Keldrick Hayes
Opinion
Order entered February 13, 2023
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00111-CV IN RE YOLANDA HAYES AND KELDRICK HAYES, Relators Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06696 ORDER Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Kennedy Before the Court is relators’ February 8, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay. We LIFT the stay issued by our February 9, 2023 order. We also WITHDRAW our request for a response to the petition.
We are in receipt of real party in interest’s February 9, 2023 letter advising us that respondent has now sustained relators’ objection to the visiting judge, as well as relator’s February 10, 2023 letter in response. In light of these developments, we question whether this original proceeding challenging the trial court’s determination to overrule relators’ objection is moot. Accordingly, relator is directed to file, no later than February 23, 2023, either a motion to dismiss the original proceeding or a letter brief showing cause why the original proceeding should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999) (“Appellate courts are prohibited from deciding moot controversies.”). Real party may file any response within ten days of relators’ filing. If any party relies on information not included in the mandamus record, that party shall file a supplemental record containing that information.
Should the Court determine it lacks jurisdiction, the original proceeding will be dismissed without further notice. The original proceeding may also be dismissed without further notice should relators fail to file the requested letter brief.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.