In Re: Ernesto Castillo v. the State of Texas
In Re: Ernesto Castillo v. the State of Texas
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed March 28, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00055-CV IN RE ERNESTO CASTILLO, Relator Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-17721 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Miskel In his January 19, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator asks us to vacate the trial court’s contempt order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.
Entitlement to mandamus relief generally requires relator to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
/Emily Miskel/ EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE 230055F.P05
–2–
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.