Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2023

In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas

In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 4, 2023

In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2023.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00212-CV

IN RE DEBRA V. JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, THE LAW OFFICE OF DEBRA JENNINGS, PLLC; AND LANEASE DICKENS-FULLER, INDIVIDUALLY AS AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, LAW OFFICE OF LANEASE FULLER, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 504,405-401 MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 3, 2023, relators Debra V. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for her Law Practice, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC; and Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller filed a petition for writ of mandamus as well as an emergency motion for temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Jason Cox, presiding judge of the Probate Court No of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s March 24, 2023 order to account and extending temporary injunction.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, all pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.