Charles R. Johnson, Sr. v. Kinetic by Windstream
Charles R. Johnson, Sr. v. Kinetic by Windstream
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-23-00014-CV
CHARLES R. JOHNSON, SR., Appellant V. KINETIC BY WINDSTREAM, Appellee
On Appeal from the 202nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 21C0612-202
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 11, 2022, the trial court entered a traditional summary judgment in favor of Windstream Services, LLC, improperly sued as Kinetic by Windstream, against Charles R. Johnson, Sr. Because Johnson did not file any motion or request that would extend the deadline to file a notice of appeal, the notice of appeal was due February 10, 2022, thirty days after the judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Johnson filed his notice of appeal on February 17, 2023, making it untimely by over one year.
By letter dated March 9, 2023, we notified Johnson of this jurisdictional defect and afforded him the opportunity to demonstrate our jurisdiction over the appeal, notwithstanding the noted defect. Johnson filed a response to our letter, but that response failed to demonstrate this Court’s jurisdiction over this attempted appeal. Consequently, we are without jurisdiction over the appeal.
In light of the foregoing, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jeff Rambin Justice Date Submitted: April 13, 2023 Date Decided: April 14, 2023
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.