Opinion issued April 27, 2023

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00963-CV ——————————— IN RE PATHFINDER SERVICES, LLC D/B/A COASTAL TERMINAL SERVICES, JACOB ANSLUM, JILL ANSLUM, DUSTIN DITTMAN, SLEGTE HOND, LLC, CHAD VLASAK, AND MONA VLASAK, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, Pathfinder Services, LLC, doing business as Coastal Terminal Services, Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, Dustin Dittman, Slegte Hond, LLC, Chad Vlasak, and Mona Vlasak, filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion in its “interpretation” and application of the trial court’s February 18, 2022 temporary injunction order.1 On April 10, 2023, relators filed a “Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” stating that “[b]ased on subsequent orders from the trial court, [the] bases of their Petition for Writ of Mandamus ha[d] become moot and [relators] desire[d] to withdraw” their petition. Relators therefore requested that “the [C]ourt remove [their mandamus petition] from its docket.” We construe relators’ notice of withdrawal as a motion to voluntarily dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

Relators’ motion does not include a certificate of conference, but more than ten days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has opposed the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, we grant relators’ motion and dismiss the petition. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

The underlying case is Pathfinder Services, LLC v. Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, and Dustin Dittman, Cause No. 2021-50845, in the 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Beau A. Miller presiding.