Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 10, 2023 No. 04-23-00422-CR IN RE Mark MOLINA Original Proceeding 1 ORDER On April 26, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review.

See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on May 10, 2023.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of May, 2023.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CR4278, styled State of Texas v. Mark Molina, pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kristina Escalona presiding.