Dismiss and Opinion Filed May 22, 2023

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00025-CV PJD LAW FIRM, PLLC D/B/A DUGAS & CIRCELLI, PLLC, Appellant V. LYNDSEY CHEEK, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-17486 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Garcia, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Stating the appeal has become moot in light of our opinion in appellate cause number 05-23-00012-CV, appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Truluck v. City of Duncanville, 277 S.W.3d 920, 924 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (appellate court lacks jurisdiction over moot controversies). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

/Bill Pedersen, III// 230025f.p05 BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT PJD LAW FIRM, PLLC D/B/A On Appeal from the 134th Judicial DUGAS & CIRCELLI, PLLC, District Court, Dallas County, Texas Appellant Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-17486.

Opinion delivered by Justice No. 05-23-00025-CV V. Pedersen, III, Justices Garcia and Kennedy participating.

LYNDSEY CHEEK, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Lyndsey Cheek recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant PJD Law Firm, PLLC d/b/a Dugas & Circelli, PLLC.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of May 2023.

–2–