Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2023

In Re Brandon Hjella v. the State of Texas

In Re Brandon Hjella v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 27, 2023

In Re Brandon Hjella v. the State of Texas

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00193-CR IN RE BRANDON HJELLA

Original Proceeding

From the Justice of the Peace, Pct 1, Place 2 McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. J12T23-0237

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Brandon Hjella has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he requests that we order the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Place 2, in McLennan County to dismiss the underlying case against him.

Article V, section 6 of the Texas Constitution, which delineates the appellate jurisdiction of the intermediate courts of appeals, provides that the courts of appeals have original jurisdiction as prescribed by law. TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6. Section 22.221(a) of the Government Code authorizes this Court to issue a writ of mandamus to enforce our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a). Section 22.221(b) of the Government Code authorizes this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court”; “a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52, Code of Criminal Procedure”; or “an associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201, Family Code,” so long as those judges are in this Court’s district. Id. § 22.221(b).

We do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace. Easton v. Franks, 842 S.W.2d 772, 773–74 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); see also In re Wilkins, No. 11-20-00049-CR, 2020 WL 868062, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland Feb. 21, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., per curiam, not designated for publication). And Hjella’s petition does not demonstrate that the relief that he requests is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss Hjella’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. Hjella’s “Emergency Motion to Advance Writ of Mandamus” is dismissed as moot.

MATT JOHNSON Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 27, 2023 Do not publish [OT06] In re Hjella Page 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.