Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2023

Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault

Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 10, 2023

Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault

Opinion

Opinion issued August 10, 2023

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00147-CV ——————————— RICHARD STILLWELL A/K/A WILBERT RICHARD STILLWELL, Appellant V. NORTH EAST PINE VILLAGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION D/B/A PINE VILLAGE NORTH ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-74522

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Richard Stillwell, also known as Wilbert Richard Stillwell, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On March 21, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by April 20, 2023.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On April 12, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by May 12, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.