Christian Chambliss v. Enclave at Brinker
Christian Chambliss v. Enclave at Brinker
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00117-CV ___________________________ CHRISTIAN CHAMBLISS, Appellant V. ENCLAVE AT BRINKER, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2023-01014-JP
Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On August 21, 2023, we notified Appellant Christian Chambliss that an appellant’s brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, Appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure to do so, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam Delivered: September 21, 2023
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.