Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2023

Maria Perez v. Araceli Denova

Maria Perez v. Araceli Denova
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 16, 2023

Maria Perez v. Araceli Denova

Opinion

Opinion issued November 16, 2023

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00543-CV ——————————— MARIA PEREZ, Appellant V. ARACELI DENOVA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1180961

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Maria Perez, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.

28, 2015). On August 17, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by September 18, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On August 25, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not submit written evidence that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by September 25, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.