In Re Waukesha-Pearce Industries, LLC v. the State of Texas
In Re Waukesha-Pearce Industries, LLC v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued November 16, 2023
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00627-CV ——————————— IN RE WAUKESHA-PEARCE INDUSTRIES, LLC, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 25, 2023, relator Waukesha-Pearce Industries, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order granting net worth discovery.1 On August 28, 2023, the same day that our Court denied relator’s motion The underlying case is Martin James Zeilinger, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth Zeilinger, deceased; Bernice Nanette Odell; Blake Raymond Zeilinger; Randall Swenson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Trey Swenson, deceased; Melissa Swenson; Makayla Hernandez; and Susan Wentz v. Waukesha-Pearce Industries LLC and Jacob Allen Svadlenak, cause number 2022-04906, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Ravi K. Sandill presiding. for an emergency stay, relator filed a mandamus petition with the Texas Supreme Court challenging the trial court’s discovery order. See In re Waukesha-Pearce Industries, LLC, Case No. 23-0700-CV. After briefing by the parties, the Texas Supreme Court denied relator’s mandamus petition on October 27, 2023. We now deny the mandamus petition pending in our Court.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas-Molloy.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.