Silicon Hills Campus LLC WC Hirshfeld Moore, LLC WC 805-809 East Sixth, LLC WC 320 Congress, LLC WC 901 East Cesar Chavez, LLC WC 1212 East Sixth, LLC WC 9005 Mountain Ridge, LLC WC 103 East Fifth, LLC And WC 422 Congress, LLC v. ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC ATX Debt Fund 2, LLC Congress Avenue Holdings, LLC Karlin Real Estate, LLC Karlin Asset Management, Inc. Pennybacker Capital, LLC Congress Avenue Holdings GP, LLC Congress Avenue Holdings, LP Karlin Cesar Chavez, LLC Karlin River Place, LLC Karlin East Sixth, LLC Karlin Mountain Ridge, LLC Karlin Phillips Building, LLC Karlin 320 Congress, LLC And Karlin 422 Congress, LLC
Silicon Hills Campus LLC WC Hirshfeld Moore, LLC WC 805-809 East Sixth, LLC WC 320 Congress, LLC WC 901 East Cesar Chavez, LLC WC 1212 East Sixth, LLC WC 9005 Mountain Ridge, LLC WC 103 East Fifth, LLC And WC 422 Congress, LLC v. ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC ATX Debt Fund 2, LLC Congress Avenue Holdings, LLC Karlin Real Estate, LLC Karlin Asset Management, Inc. Pennybacker Capital, LLC Congress Avenue Holdings GP, LLC Congress Avenue Holdings, LP Karlin Cesar Chavez, LLC Karlin River Place, LLC Karlin East Sixth, LLC Karlin Mountain Ridge, LLC Karlin Phillips Building, LLC Karlin 320 Congress, LLC And Karlin 422 Congress, LLC
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 2, 2024
NO. 03-24-00060-CV
Silicon Hills Campus LLC; WC Hirshfeld Moore, LLC; WC 805-809 East Sixth, LLC; WC 320 Congress, LLC; WC 901 East Cesar Chavez, LLC; WC 1212 East Sixth, LLC; WC 9005 Mountain Ridge, LLC; WC 103 East Fifth, LLC; and WC 422 Congress, LLC, Appellants v. ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC; ATX Debt Fund 2, LLC; Congress Avenue Holdings, LLC; Karlin Real Estate, LLC; Karlin Asset Management, Inc.; Pennybacker Capital, LLC; Congress Avenue Holdings GP, LLC; Congress Avenue Holdings, LP; Karlin Cesar Chavez, LLC; Karlin River Place, LLC; Karlin East Sixth, LLC; Karlin Mountain Ridge, LLC; Karlin Phillips Building, LLC; Karlin 320 Congress, LLC; and Karlin 422 Congress, LLC, Appellees
APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND THEOFANIS DISMISSED ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH
This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 25, 2023. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.