In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00077-CV ___________________________ BRANDY RICHARDS, Appellant V. RFI THE PINNACLE LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2024-00361-JP

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on July 5, 2024. On July 15, 2024, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, on or before July 25, 2024, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam Delivered: August 8, 2024

In other correspondence with appellant, we notified her that her docketing statement had not been filed and directed her to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Despite that correspondence, appellant has not filed a docketing statement.