Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2024

Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC

Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 23, 2024

Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC

Opinion

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Opinion Filed August 23, 2024

S In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00324-CV LEO BIENATI, THERESA PHAM, CARLOS LACAYO AND ANDRES RUZO, Appellants V. CLOISTER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17448 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Carlyle, Goldstein, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appellants state they no longer desire to continue their appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

/Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE 220324F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT LEO BIENATI, THERESA PHAM, On Appeal from the 134th Judicial CARLOS LACAYO AND ANDRES District Court, Dallas County, Texas RUZO, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17448.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle.

No. 05-22-00324-CV V. Justices Goldstein and Kennedy participating.

CLOISTER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of August 2024.

–2–

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.