DENIED and Opinion Filed August 20, 2024

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00801-CV IN RE SANTIAGO MARTINEZ, Relator Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-18712 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness In his July 3, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify temporary orders.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Additionally, based on our review, relator’s petition and its attached appendix contain unredacted sensitive data—such as a minor’s full name—in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9.

Accordingly, we strike relator’s petition and its attached appendix.

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 240801F.P05 JUSTICE

–2–