In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00191-CV ___________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF J.H. AND E.H., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360-694947-21

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell MEMORANDUM OPINION The trial court terminated Appellant Mother’s parental rights to her children J.H. and E.H. based on its findings on endangerment, on her failure to comply with court orders, on her controlled-substance use in a manner that endangered the children’s health or safety, and on the children’s best interests.1 See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)(D), (E), (O), (P), (2).

Mother’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an Anders brief2 in which she concludes that, after a thorough review of the appellate record, the appeal is frivolous.

See In re K.W., No. 02-23-00082-CV, 2023 WL 4289613, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 30, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.). Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and showing why there are no arguable grounds to advance on appeal.

We provided Mother the opportunity to obtain a copy of the appellate record and to file a pro se response, but she has not done so. The Department of Family and Protective Services has agreed with Mother’s counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

When an Anders brief is filed, we must independently examine the appellate record to determine if any arguable grounds for appeal exist. In re C.J., No. 02-18- The trial court terminated the children’s father’s parental rights in 2022.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967); see In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 776–77 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) (holding Anders procedures apply in termination-of-parental-rights cases), disp. on merits, No. 02-01- 00349-CV, 2003 WL 2006583 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 1, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).

00219-CV, 2018 WL 4496240, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 20, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.). Having carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the appellate record, we agree with counsel that Mother’s appeal is without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 850 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, pet. denied). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating the parent–child relationship between Mother and the children. 3 /s/ Wade Birdwell Wade Birdwell Justice Delivered: August 22, 2024

Mother’s counsel remains appointed through proceedings in the Texas Supreme Court unless otherwise relieved. See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016) (order); see also Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.016(2)(C).